When You’re Under SAMs, It Is Never More True That Actions Speak Louder Than Words

I have just read the article by Mary Maxwell for Gumshoe News “Tsarnaev to Walk – Supreme Court Overturns the McCoy Ruling.”  Though I may not understand all the ins and outs of just what will have to transpire in order for this ruling to either grant Dzhokhar a new trial or actually free him, I do know it is good news.

The Ruling:

Held: The Sixth Amendment guarantees a defendant the right to choose the objective of his defense and to insist that his counsel refrain from admitting guilt, even when counsel’s experience-based view is that confessing guilt offers the defendant the best chance to avoid the death penalty. Pp 5-13.”

Toward the end of her article, Mary sounds a note of caution:

Admittedly, it’s a tad tricky as he (Dzhokhar) has never been heard to say ‘help me get a better lawyer.’ In fact, he has never been heard to say anything. Exactly on a par with Martin Bryant in Australia. Not one word.”

I say the proof he wanted a better (as in different, as in independent) team of lawyers lies here:

1) He refused to accept these government-appointed lawyers until his own mother was coerced into coercing him to accept their representation.

2) He was heard to say not one but two words thirty times: “not guilty,” indicating from the outset that he never agreed to have his lawyer state guilt in opening statements.

3) Per the journalists tweeting from the courtroom during the trial, Dzhokhar left the courtroom angry on the day of Clarke’s opening statement, slapping away a note from Bill Fick as he walked out. Remember when that was tweeted?

A competent, ethical attorney could argue Dzhokhar’s actions spoke louder than the words he was prevented by the SAMs from saying. And that the only words he was allowed to say, “not guilty,”  backed up those actions.

That would be enough to convince me.

If I were going to defend Dzhokhar’s right to a new trial based on the McCoy ruling, I would refute any mention of his answer to the judge that he was satisfied with his defense team (remember when O’Toole asked him that at the close of the trial)? I mean, what else was he going to say, cowed, convicted, cornered and broken as he was after all he had endured during the trial…

And as for that awkwardly-worded statement he made after sentencing, if I were Dzhokhar’s attorney, I would demand to see the letter Dzhokhar’s mother wrote urging him to accept those government-appointed lawyers. I’d be looking to see if she urged him to accept these “lovely companions.”

I’m sure the kid doesn’t talk like that. Besides, saying someone is a lovely companion is not saying much when your only other companions are the dust bunnies rolling around in the corners of your cell.

A final thought to consider: one can be a “lovely companion” and a “worthless lawyer” at the same time for they are, after all, two completely different things. Dzhokhar didn’t need lovely companions. He needed lawyers who would defend him. He needed lawyers who could not be bullied or bought. In the end, Dzhokhar Tsarnaev had neither lovely companions nor the legal representation his innocence deserved and that’s a wrong that must be righted. Hopefully with the McCoy ruling, we are moving ever closer to that becoming a reality.

5 thoughts on “When You’re Under SAMs, It Is Never More True That Actions Speak Louder Than Words”

  1. We better get used to the way governments set up their patsies: use fatuous rules of evidence to preclude evidence of non-guilt; fabricate more convenient evidence; apply pressure to friends and relations to hold them at bay; arrange for a compliant judge; ensure the media moguls are on-side and complicit (ie Rupert Murdoch); and find defense lawyers who are bumblingly incompetent or compliant with state objectives.

    All that can be said with two words… corrupt judiciary. Yup, there’s lotsa that goin’ around; in the US and in Australia.

    1. After seeing enough of this we have indeed figured out the plan being followed both here and in other countries. Where I break with most of the pack is the point where faith comes in. Faith in a God who, according to the Bible, makes crooked things straight, a God for whom nothing is impossible. I base my belief that Dzhokhar, in spite of all the odds, will go free because this is what the Lord intends.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s