What Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and President Trump Now Have in Common

One is brash, the other quiet. One is rich, the other poor. One is voiceless and powerless while the other holds the very reigns of ultimate power as leader of the free world. In many ways the convicted Boston Marathon bomber and our 45th President probably couldn’t be more different.

But Donald Trump and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev now share a common experience so significant, that if the dots were to be connected by the right people, it could form the basis to set Dzhokhar Tsarnaev free and stem the tide of false flag terror attacks we have seen with escalating frequency. Imagine that.

In a 1939 radio broadcast, one year before he became Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Winston Churchill said: “I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma, but perhaps there is a key. That key is Russian national interest.”

Though Churchill used his now-famous phrase to describe the complexities of Russia in his day, his words could be just as aptly applied to the events surrounding the 2013 Boston Marathon and our earliest understanding of those events. But in our time, the key to understanding the riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma that sent Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to death row, and, so far, keeps him there, lies much closer to home than Mother Russia.


Mirrors distort, amuse and confuse. Glass panels show the hapless wanderer parts of the maze they can not yet get to. The overwhelming emotion at the end of the experience is likely one of secret relief. This is what is commonly known as a House Of Mirrors. No carnival or country fair is complete without one. Neither is any false flag staged terror attack.

In the early days of the Boston Marathon bombing, I read, watched and followed every source of information I could find. These days, I am much more selective. I have learned to recognize a proverbial House of Mirrors when I see one; I have entered  more than my fair share and the experience no longer amuses me.


…the overall story of the bombing brothers was never doubted.

Meanwhile, the news media poured flames on the emotional fire while keeping us distracted from clear facts that showed us to be cheering for a script rather than a triumph over real adversity. The result is that people came together to celebrate their strength and resilience based upon a lie. The tragedy creates a kind of “feel-good” bonding situation that people don’t want interfered with.

Anyone who questions the facts is seen as an intruder in the “overcoming-tragedy” presentation. We are told we are disrespecting the victims, that we should leave the “conspiracy crap” for a later time (or cut it out altogether). What an effective way to marginalize anyone who dares to question the story or use their brain in any way.

Craig McKee: “Justice Denied: Tsarnaev’s Own Lawyer Ignores Evidence He is Innocent of Boston Bombing” on his blog truthandshadows.wordpress.com

At a time when some writers I once found relevant and important have floundered and fallen (or willingly jumped) down rabbit holes that draw readers off into everything from feminism to irrelevant history lessons and victim worship, confusing the real issue that is central to what happened at the 2013 Boston Marathon, Craig McKee and others who guest his site are still exposing and advancing the truth.

To avoid becoming hopelessly lost in a House of Mirrors, one must realize and accept the fact that men like Peter Peekay, Jim Fetzer, Nathan Folks and others are right: What was portrayed, what was reported, what was donated to, what was propped up and prosecuted as a real crime of terror that sent an innocent young man to death row was nothing more than a lie brought to us in living color courtesy of our own federal government. Again.

Investigative journalist Sheila Casey has written an excellent article on Truth and Shadows: “False Flag Theater: Boston Bombing Involves Clearly Staged Carnage.” It is a well-reasoned and thoughtful guide through the chicanery that came to be known as the Boston Marathon bombing for those who would read it with an open mind.


Those who still believe that three people died and many others were horribly injured when twin bombs detonated at the 2013 Boston Marathon simply will not allow anything resembling serious discussion. It matters not how respectfully one questions the official story. Dare to question, and insults are sure to follow, along with a lot of indignant flaptrap that, when broken down, just doesn’t mean a whole lot.

Here is an example from a popular forum I used to follow (I have named this person THOUGHTFUL OBSERVER):

THOUGHTFUL OBSERVER: This is in reference to the next-to-last photograph. Mr. Richard is allegedly holding his daughter and oldest son. The uncropped version shows she is missing a good part of her leg. I find it odd that he would spend so much energy holding up a relatively unharmed older child, when his younger child is in a life or death situation. Do you find that odd as well?

I also find it odd that he wouldn’t choose to hold the child horizontally, for the purpose of slowing down blood loss. Do you find that odd as well?

But what I find MUCH MORE than odd, surreal even, is the idea that he would have then decided to put a child (who is on death’s door) BACK DOWN ON THE STREET. We know this happened because we have later images of the child sitting independently next to her father and brother, only to have an off-duty fireman rush out to help her. To repeat, because this is a REALLY important point: AFTER the girl is photographed in her father’s arms (as seen in your next-to-last photo) she is THEN found sitting  NEXT to her father/brother on the street. The father isn’t even holding the child on his lap! In my opinion, these facts don’t make any sense at all, from what we know about the universe. This is one reason (among MANY) that so many people are questioning the entire story. 

I have much more to say about this, but I’d like to wait for your response first. Thanks for reading.

At some point, the referenced video was embedded on the site showing the firefighter coming to the aid of Jane Richard as indeed she sits in the street while her father and brother sit in the street next to her watching.

When several less-than-rational, less-than-relevant responses are finally received, THOUGHTFUL OBSERVER goes on to say:

Thanks so much for responding. When I first saw some of this footage, I initially felt like you do, but after dozens of hours of research into the details of the footage, I have concluded that I have yet to see a clearly authentic victim of these attacks. (There is much more disturbing footage available which seems to support this conclusion, but I won’t bring it into this discussion at this point).

Anyway, I get the feeling that you don’t want to discuss this further, but just in case you are willing, I was wondering if you might think about responding more specifically to the following observations I made about the Valverde video, which is based on actual photos/video footage from the scene. (Sorry about the rude references to their weight).

1. The sisters don’t appear to confer with each other after the bombing to talk about the following: What has just happened? Who is injured? What should we do now? etc.

2. Neither sister shows signs of looking for her daughter/niece.

3. Neither sister behaves as if she is injured (one’s first instinct would normally be to sit down and take the weight off of one’s “injured” foot).

4. Sara is supposedly seriously injured but oddly focused on something in the vicinity of the cameraman, who is located on the second story of a building…

5. Mildred is being watched and intercepted by “busybody,” with whom she is clearly not friends, as she approaches the candy shop, only to be physically woman-handled by her. Busybody then has no further contact with her. I would certainly not let busybody woman-handle me without an explanation, would you?

6. Mildred takes the time to take pictures of Bauman, while her sister is not only seriously injured, but her 10 year old niece is missing!!!

7. The person hobbling around on crutches at the hearing doesn’t remotely resemble Sara. Why is Mildred seemingly taking her place?

8. The child does not seem injured at all immediately after the “bomb” has exploded. Nor do her jeans appear to have been damaged.

If you aren’t interested in discussing this further, I understand. Thanks for reading!

The person THOUGHTFUL OBSERVER was talking to completely avoided the uncomfortable facts being presented by responding with the inane suggestion that THOUGHTFUL OBSERVER invest in a trip to Boston to talk to some of the victims as this would certainly provide a different perspective on the videos.

The person I call THOUGHTFUL OBSERVER wisely chose not to comment further.

I didn’t know whether to laugh or swear in frustration.

The folks who regularly comment and write articles on the site visited by THOUGHTFUL OBSERVER may not have wanted to have a real and honest discussion that day out of what they like to tell themselves is “respect for the victims” but I will.

Imagine this: Bill Richard is called to the witness stand by the prosecution. The testimony he gives, under oath, amounts to nothing more than a victim impact statement – or perjury, depending on one’s frame of reference. Either way, his story does nothing to implicate the Tsarnaev brothers.

And then it is the defense attorney’s turn.

The videos of footage begin to play, following Bill Richard’s every move after the “explosions.” Some of the questioning mirrors the comments and observations posted by THOUGHTFUL OBSERVER:

This is in reference to the next-to-last photograph, Mr. Richard. You are allegedly holding your daughter and oldest son. The photo shows she is missing a good part of her leg. I find it odd that you would spend so much energy holding up a relatively unharmed older child, when your younger child is in a life or death situation. Do you find that odd as well?

I also find it odd that you wouldn’t choose to hold the child horizontally, for the purpose of slowing down blood loss. Do you find that odd as well?

But what I find MUCH MORE than odd, surreal even, is the idea that you would have then decided to put a child (who is on death’s door) BACK DOWN ON THE STREET. We know this happened because we have later images of the child sitting independently next to you and your son, only to have an off-duty fireman rush out to help her. To repeat, because this is a REALLY important point: AFTER the girl is photographed in YOUR arms (as seen in this photo) she is THEN found sitting NEXT to you and your son on the street. You aren’t even holding the child on your lap!

In my opinion, these facts don’t make any sense at all, from what we know about the universe. This is one reason (among MANY) that so many people are questioning the entire story.

Help us understand what’s going on here, Mr. Richard…

Any attorney who would have taken this line of questioning with a sympathetic witness like Bill Richard would never have betrayed their own client by saying “it was him” in their opening statement.

If Dzhokhar Tsarnaev had had an attorney willing to ask the alleged VICTIMS some tough questions, we might have had a real trial and we might know today what really happened at the Boston Marathon in 2013.

Can you just imagine the Valverde sisters trying to explain away their actions in court as the tape rolled?


While working on this post last night, I suddenly decided to see for myself what real, authentic horrific injuries look like for the sake of comparison to the crisis actor Boston Marathon images. When I stopped googling phrases that contained the words “war,” “bomb” or “bombing,” I found what I was looking for. I was almost instantly sorry.

As soon as I say this, I know that some who are reading this post will do the exact opposite of what I advise and go looking on your own. If you do, don’t say I didn’t warn you. Catastrophic injuries from car accidents and plane crashes, especially those that occur in other countries where journalistic standards may be quite different than ours, are quite disturbing.

Once you see something, you can’t un-see it. I was never in the medical profession or law enforcement. These images bothered me. A lot. My chest got tight. I began to feel anxious. And then I cried and had to log off. I’d seen enough.

What I noticed stands in stark contrast to the images from the 2013 Boston Marathon:

1. BYSTANDERS: No one is pointing, no one is looking away, no one is directing bystanders to leave the area, there is no frantic movement, no looks of “oh my God!”

Why would this be, you ask? Well, my theory is because people are in shock. Seeing these kind of injuries, for real, sucks the emotion out of you, your affect goes flat. And the worst part is – you can’t look away. Everyone is still in the background of these photos, staring in disbelief at the same thing, the horribly injured victims.

This is most certainly NOT what you see in image after image from the marathon.

The behavior, the pointing, the looking in all different directions, it looks exactly like a staged movie set, not a real crisis with real injuries. Not to me. Especially not after what I forced myself to look at last night.

2. FIRST RESPONDERS: In real emergencies, they are so focused on the victims they seem to all but ignore bystanders as long as they are just standing there out of the way, letting them tend to victims.

At the 2013 Boston Marathon there is way too much seemingly unnecessary interraction between first responders and uninjured bystanders to be anything other than hype for the cameras. Add to that the fact that, again and again, clearly uninjured bystanders are seen running around the scene, watching, pointing, going back over their own tracks for no apparent reason, only to suddenly end up on the ground or in a wheelchair with suddenly visible injuries that “appeared” long after the “bombs” went off.

3. THE VICTIMS: The force of a real accident will twist a body into positions not possible for a crisis actor to achieve. The force will grind your face into the pavement, the glass, the dirt. And accidents are not well-mannered: breasts, bra, undies, genitals will quite likely be exposed, at least on a couple victims, if there are enough of them. It’s the law of averages. Your hair will never be the same and quite likely your face.

You won’t see people propped on their elbows who don’t want their face or their head against the dirty Boston pavement. You won’t see shredded clothes and unharmed skin underneath – not if the injuries are real.

So now we have an innocent young man on death row, convicted of a crime that never even happened. Nobody died, nobody was injured when twin smoke bombs went off at the 2013 Boston Marathon. What’s next?


Whether you love him, hate him, or don’t care either way, the fact is, a clear majority of the American voters put Donald Trump in the White House, not the Russians.

“Enter the Dragon” starring Bruce Lee ends with one of the most famous Hall of Mirrors sequences in the history of film. As he is about to enter this place of danger and distortion, an unseen voice is heard saying:

Remember, the enemy has only images and illusions behind which he hides his true motives. Destroy the image and you will break the enemy.”

In the sequence that follows, Lee’s character learns it is best to smash the glass obstacles to solve his problem and defeat the villain who is trying to kill him.

President Trump would do well to follow that same advice.

This President knows how it feels to be viciously, relentlessly, falsely accused. Rumors abound that his enemies intend to see him impeached at all costs.

The current tempest-in-a-teacup centers around claims the President attempted to interfere in an investigation into a crime that is itself much-ado-about-nothing.

If President Trump were to respond with an unexpected action and interfered INSTEAD in the conviction of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev by executive order, imagine how it would rip the rug out from under many who insist on hating and disrespecting our 45th President.

This President has already demonstrated bold, decisive action and outside-the-box vision. Recognizing and declaring Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s innocence and calling for an end to his false imprisonment could be just the blow needed to smash the Islamophobic image fostered by those who would conquer and divide this country.

I can easily imagine him telling his advisors “I am willing to stand alone on this…”

And stand he will, for the Lord is able to make him stand. Romans 14:4

A few nights ago, I listened to a recording from the 1960s that laid out the plans of the Illuminati from the time of its founding.  It was fascinating but left me quite disturbed and gloomy as I later attempted sleep.

The following morning, the Lord drew my attention to a verse of scripture regarding what I’d listened to the night before. What it made me realize put a smile on my face.

He frustrates the plans of the wicked.

When I looked it up, I discovered the Bible says this in two separate passages and both are especially meaningful to the subject of the Illuminati and their long-range goals:

Psalm 33:10-11 The Lord foils the plans of the nations; He thwarts the purposes of the peoples. But THE PLANS OF THE LORD stand firm forever, the purposes of HIS heart through all generations.

In the recording, the speaker explained how the plans of the Illuminati, in place for many centuries, would advance unimpeded for decades only to be suddenly and unexpectedly thwarted and completely undone by a single incident – such as when a strategic messenger was struck by lightning before his message could be delivered, or by the resistance and decisions of a single man: the Czar of Russia, who embodied the country’s love of national sovereignty, President Lincoln when he saw through and rejected attempts to create the federal reserve, President Roosevelt when he unexpectedly refused to allow the United States to join the League of Nations. According to the speaker, THAT decision REALLY sent the globalists back to the drawing board!

As I reflected on these scriptures in relation to the plans of the Illuminati, the Lord impressed this upon my heart: He is all-powerful, all-mighty, all-knowing God. He is completely aware of the plans of the enemy for Dzhokhar, for President Trump, for our country, for this world, and he is not in fear over whether or not He can prevent those evil plans from succeeding.

He reminded me of this: In a game of cat and mouse, the cat doesn’t worry about whether or not he will be able to kill the mouse. The cat doesn’t struggle, doesn’t question who is in charge. The cat LETS the mouse run only so far before dragging it back by the tail. Then the cat allows the game to begin again, until HE decides the game is over.

Job 5:12-13 He thwarts the plans of the crafty, so that their hands achieve no success. He catches the wise in their craftiness, and the schemes of the wily are swept away.

Could it be that He has allowed President Trump to be falsely accused of interference in an “investigation” and threatened with impeachment at just such a time as this to achieve the Lord’s good purpose in Dzhokhar’s life as well as his own?

I know what I’d say if I were advising him.




Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s